Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 393 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an overall score of 79.2, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. Even though the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A70, it's much thinner and also newer. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has newer 15 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it counts with a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A70 has a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light captures, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior memory for applications and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a bit better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 4% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.