Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Meteor grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's body is newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A70 and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW count with extremely similar displays, because although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a bit worse count of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW features a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also counts with better video frame rates and a much bigger sensor.
Galaxy A70 features a slightly better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports 488 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a battery performance that is just as good as Galaxy A70's battery life.
Although Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy A70, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.