Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a bit better than the Nokia 9 PureView, having a 76.9 score against 76.4. The Galaxy A70 body has the same thickness than the Nokia 9 PureView, but it's a little heavier. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A70. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Nokia 9 PureView takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same video resolution and the same camera sensor size.
The Galaxy A70 has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A70 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A70 features greater battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3320mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.