Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is just a bit better than Galaxy A70, having a global score of 80.8 against 76.9. The Nokia XR20 is a much newer phone than Galaxy A70, but it is way heavier and much thicker. These phones include Android OS, but the Nokia XR20 has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features.
Nokia XR20 has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both of them have the same display density, a display with the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Nokia XR20 and Samsung Galaxy A70 have similar storage to store more apps and games, they have a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity.
Nokia XR20's CPU is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A70's processing unit, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Nokia XR20 features a little longer battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 4630mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh. The Nokia XR20 has a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with faster video frame rate and a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy A70. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Nokia XR20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.