Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, with a overall score of 76.9 against 75.8. Galaxy A70's body is lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3S, even when they were released with only 6 months difference. These devices have Android OS, but Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a just a little less pixels per screen inch and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, they both have a same size display.
The nubia Red Magic 3S captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and pictures and a way better video quality. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A70 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.