Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 OS. Galaxy A70's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S, although it was released just a little more than a year before.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a little bit lower pixel density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a display with the same size. Galaxy A70 has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor and a way higher video definition.
The nubia Red Magic 5S's battery duration is very similar to Galaxy A70's battery performance.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy A70 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.