Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Neo is a bit better than Galaxy A70, with a 77.7 score against 76.9. Both of these phones have the same Android 10 OS. OPPO Find X2 Neo is a newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A70. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy A70 counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a little better battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4025mAh. OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.