Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is much better than the Galaxy A70, with an 84.6 score against 76.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a lot newer than the Galaxy A70, it's somewhat thicker and a little bit heavier. Both devices we are comparing come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has the newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, counting with a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's processing unit is just as good as Galaxy A70's CPU, and although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit more storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A22 5G features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light images and video, they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.