Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is better than the Galaxy A70, having a general score of 86.6 against 76.9. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a a bit thinner and just a bit lighter device than Galaxy A70, even though both were released only 6 months apart. These phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should give very similar operating system features.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have the same number of cores and 6 GB of RAM. The Galaxy A50s has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density.
The Galaxy A50s shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy A50s features as much storage capacity to install games and applications as Samsung Galaxy A70, both of them have equal internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.