Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is better than Samsung Galaxy A70, having an 85.5 score against 76.9. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Galaxy A51 has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, offering some nice extra features and enhanced performance. Galaxy A51's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's a little lighter.
Galaxy A51 has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A70, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy A51 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a little bit better number of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy A51's storage capacity to install applications and games is just as good as the Galaxy A70 one, both have a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A70 features just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A51, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 is also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.