Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a score of 90.7 against 76.9. Even though Galaxy A52 is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it's just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A52 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70. Both of them have 6 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy A52 has just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52's battery lifetime is just as good as Samsung Galaxy A70's battery performance. Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.