Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having an 84.6 score against 76.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy F23 is a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A70, it's way lighter and notably newer. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has a more recent 12 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10.
Samsung Galaxy A70 and Samsung Galaxy F23 have similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy F23 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy F23 has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2408 resolution.
Galaxy A70 has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy F23, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F23 features a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture.
Galaxy F23 features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.