Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is much better than the Galaxy A70, with a score of 85.2 against 76.9. Galaxy F41 is a newer phone than the Galaxy A70, but it's a little bit heavier and thicker. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but Galaxy F41 has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10.
The Galaxy F41 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy F41 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy F41, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy F41 counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a much larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Galaxy F41 has better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.