Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has the newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, giving a lot of extra features. Galaxy F62's body is newer than Samsung Galaxy A70's, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
Galaxy F62 features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A70, although it has a lower number of cores , they both have a 6 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy F62 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A70. Both of them have a screen with the same size, the same pixels density and the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy F62 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy F62 has a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 7000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.