Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having a global score of 78.9 against 76.9. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both of them should give identical operating system features. Although it's the best phone we compare here, Galaxy M20 is a just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy A70.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M20 has a display that is very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy A70, because although the Samsung Galaxy M20 has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited environments and a smaller sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M20, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M20 features just a little better battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.