Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. Although the Galaxy Note 20 is newer than the Galaxy A70, it is just a bit thicker and a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A70. Both of them have a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display, a display of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way bigger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A70 has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A70, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.