Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. Galaxy Note 3's design is just a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A70, although it is a little bit thicker and was released 6 years before. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy Note 3 has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, a bit smaller screen and a bit lower screen density.
The Galaxy A70 has a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a much smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in low-light environments and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Galaxy Note 3 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.