Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than the Galaxy A70, with a score of 80.4 against 76.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a just a little lighter phone than the Galaxy A70, but both have the same thickness. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 41 percent greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.