Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 overall score. Galaxy Note10's body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's just a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher number of pixels in each display inch.
The Galaxy A70 counts with slightly more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy Note10 has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note10 takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy Note10 also has faster video frame rates, a larger back-facing camera sensor and a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A70, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.