Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than Galaxy A70, with a overall score of 88.3 against 76.9. Galaxy S10 is a lighter cellphone than Galaxy A70, but both are equally thin. These phones use Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S10 has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a higher pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a greater camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rate, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy S10's storage to install games and applications is very similar to the Galaxy A70 one, they have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A70 features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 32 percent greater battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.