Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, with a global score of 93.6 against 76.9. Galaxy S10 5G's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A70, but it's a little bit heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has better 60 fps video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a bigger sensor.
Galaxy S10 5G's battery lifetime is just as good as Galaxy A70's battery duration.
Galaxy S10 5G costs a bit more than Galaxy A70, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.