Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-26 | -- |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having a 90.7 score against 76.9. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is a lot lighter and way thinner than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, giving some extra features and increased performance.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A70, because it has a better number of pixels per inch in the display, a little bit larger display and a better 1440 x 3088px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a little bit better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 features a much more powerful processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has an 11 percent more battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.