Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a global score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A70's score of 76.9. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has newer 4.4.2 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing the user some nice extra features and better performance. Even though Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport is a lot older and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy A70, it's body is still lighter.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy S5 Sport features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A70, because although it has lesser cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processor.
The Galaxy S5 Sport takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a much tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy S5 Sport also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 112 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
The Galaxy S5 Sport costs exactly the same than the Samsung Galaxy A70, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.