Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A70 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, getting a general score of 76.9 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A70 is a incredibly newer phone, and it is also notably thinner and just a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a much better screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more CPU cores and more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A70. Both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and a same size aperture.
Although Galaxy A70 is a better device, it is more expensive than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.