Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy A70, with a 77.6 score against 76.9. Both devices we compare here work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a more recent 12 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, counting with a lot of extra features and performance enhancements. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's design is a lot newer, but notably thicker and much heavier than Galaxy A70.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little worse display density, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A70 also counts with a bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a very superior hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a slightly better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A70, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A70 has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has an 11% greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.