Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than Galaxy A70, with a score of 81 against 76.9. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer cellphone than Galaxy A70, although it's thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a bit better pixel count in each inch of screen.
The Galaxy A70 features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A70 also has more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing way lower quality photographs and videos, they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rates and a F1.7 aperture.
The Galaxy A70 counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A70, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.