Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a global score of 85.6, which is much better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's design has the same weight than Galaxy A70, but it's somewhat thinner. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, providing a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a bit better screen than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a little better pixel density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 3 captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking images and videos in low light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features superior battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some money, you can get Galaxy A70, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.