Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Galaxy A70, having a 92.3 score against 76.9. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G design has the same weight than the Galaxy A70, but it's just a little bit thinner.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with better video frame rate and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Galaxy A70 features a bit more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 features improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 36% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G costs a lot more than the Galaxy A70, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.