Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, having a global score of 90.6 against 76.9. Both of these phones use Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 3 is heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it's thinner and also extremely newer.
Galaxy A70 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a little better performance than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 2% more battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.