Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-04-26 | -- |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black Shadow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a more recent 14 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, offering some extra features and performance optimizations. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a heavier but noticeably thinner device than the Galaxy A70.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a better resolution of 1968 x 2184. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A70, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a very superior CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking photos or videos in low light situations.
Galaxy A70 has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has a 2% more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A70, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.