Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-07-30 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 3.15 x 0.47 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 760 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3540mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ2 Premium has a score of 82.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. The Xperia XZ2 Premium is better than Samsung Galaxy A70, we must tell that it is also older, much thicker and noticeably heavier. Xperia XZ2 Premium features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A70. Both of them have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 2160 x 3840px and a lot more pixels per screen inch. Xperia XZ2 Premium counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xperia XZ2 Premium also counts with a larger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A70 features superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZ2 Premium is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A70, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.