Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZs is a little bit better than the Galaxy A70, having a 77.2 score against 76.9. Xperia XZs is a way older and a bit thicker phone than Galaxy A70, but Sony managed to make it lighter anyway. The Xperia XZs has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A70 counts with a little faster CPU than Xperia XZs, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Xperia XZs takes greater videos and photos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography, and they both have the same video quality, the Xperia XZs also counts with a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and higher 960 fps video frame rate.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much better battery life than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a 55 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia XZs is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A70. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy A70, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.