Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia Z4v is a bit better than the Galaxy A70, having a score of 78.8 against 76.9. Both devices in this review have Android OS, but the Xperia Z4v has an older 5.1 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10. Despite of the fact the Xperia Z4v is older and just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A70, it's body is still somewhat lighter.
Xperia Z4v counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Xperia Z4v features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Xperia Z4v also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A70 features a much longer battery life than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Xperia Z4v captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video quality, the Xperia Z4v also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xperia Z4v not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.