Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-04-26 | -- |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 12S Ultra is a bit better than the Galaxy A70, with a score of 81 against 76.9. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Xiaomi 12S Ultra has the newer 12 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10. Xiaomi 12S Ultra is a noticeably lighter and a lot thinner device than the Galaxy A70.
Galaxy A70 counts with a much better processing power than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi 12S Ultra has a way better display than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size screen, the Xiaomi 12S Ultra also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a better display pixel density.
The Galaxy A70 has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi 12S Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi 12S Ultra takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi 12S Ultra has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 7% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.