Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark has an overall score of 80.4, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's 76.9 score. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. The Xiaomi Black Shark is an older, thicker and a little heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy A70.
The Xiaomi Black Shark has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark also has a higher amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels density.
The Galaxy A70 has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture and a tinier camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.