Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has an overall score of 82.9, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it must be noted that it's also a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier device. These devices use Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and faster video frame rate.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A70 features a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.