Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blasting black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy A70, with a global score of 90.1 against 76.9. Even though the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A70, it's heavier and a lot thicker. Both devices in our current comparison have the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so both should offer all the same OS features.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little bit better display than Galaxy A70, because it has a better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a just a bit greater pixels quantity per inch of display and a quite larger display.
The Galaxy A70 counts with slightly more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and faster video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.