Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting an 82.7 score against 76.9. Both of these devices work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. Even being the best we compare here, we must note that it is also a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have 6 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A70 counts with a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.