Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-04-26 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blue, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi A3 is just a bit better than Galaxy A70, with a 79.2 score against 76.9. Even though Xiaomi Mi A3 and the Galaxy A70 were released only a couple of months apart, the Xiaomi Mi A3 design is a little thicker but just a little bit lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi A3 has the newer 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, counting with a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy A70 has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy A70 features a bit sharper display than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a greater display density, a bit larger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Mi A3, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A70 has a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi A3 takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Mi A3 also counts with a bigger camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.