Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, having an 83.8 score against 76.9. Although it's the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also an older, a little heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density.
The Galaxy A70 counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A70 has longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a lot better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A70, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.