Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-04-26 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a general score of 83.8, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 design is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than Galaxy A70. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A70 features a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.