Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-04-26 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2's 76 score. Both devices we are comparing have Android operating system, but the Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Although the Galaxy A70 is much newer than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, it is a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker.
Galaxy A70 features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A70 also has 4 more CPU cores (although slower). Galaxy A70 features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a larger display, a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit better number of pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Mi Note 2 also counts with a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Galaxy A70 features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy A70 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit superior battery life than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4070mAh.
The Galaxy A70 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.