Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a score of 87.9, which is much better than the Galaxy A70's global score of 76.9. Even though the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is newer than the Galaxy A70, it is heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones use the same Android 10 OS (operating system). The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A70. They have a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a display of the same size and an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A70. They have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy A70 has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A70 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A70, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.