Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2023-05-09 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 524 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1400 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 2 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a general score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has the newer 13 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version. Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro is a way newer phone than Galaxy A70, although it's heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro features a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro also has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy A70 has an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photography. Samsung Galaxy A70 features slightly more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Xiaomi POCO F5 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A70, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.