Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco M3 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a 78.2 score against 76.9. Both devices in this comparison come with the same Android 10 operating system. The Xiaomi Poco M3 body is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A70's, but it is somewhat thicker and just a little heavier. Galaxy A70 features a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with a display that is just as good as Galaxy A70's display, because although the Xiaomi Poco M3 has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with much more storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco M3, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A70, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M3 features a much better camera than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much larger sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.