Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a score of 78.2, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T body is newer than Samsung Galaxy A70's, although it's just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones include the same Android 10 OS. Galaxy A70 and Xiaomi Redmi 9T have quite similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a little smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photographs and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.