Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A70, with a overall score of 82.4 against 76.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A70's, but it is a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, giving you a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A70. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a same size screen and a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing pictures or video in low light environments, they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5020mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy A70.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.