Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 3.52 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has an overall score of 78.2, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A70's general score of 76.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's design is newer and a little lighter than Galaxy A70's, but it is just a little thicker. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it provides you some nice extra features.
Galaxy A70 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S have quite similar CPUs, they have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a sharper screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density.
Galaxy A70 features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light captures.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.