Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | -- |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting an 86.1 score against 76.9. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10, providing the user a couple additional features. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's design is just a bit thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A70.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a better 2080 x 2400 resolution and a bit greater pixels amount in each inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A70 has a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A70, because it has a 15% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.