Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-04-26 | -- |
| 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 299.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 612 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 3.52 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a bit better than Galaxy A70, having a 77.1 score against 76.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance improvements. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is a just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone than Galaxy A70.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a same size display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a little greater screen density and a better 2080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.